Chauvinism rears its ugly head
The following letter ran in the Glens Falls Post Star, the paper for a town a bit north of where I live. Kirsten Gillibrand was elected to the US House of Representatives in 2006 in the district that borders mine and while I couldn't vote for her, I followed her campaign closely and was very happy to see her win. This letter absolutely turns my stomach.
The Glens Falls Post Star
Published: Thursday, December 20th, 2007
Editor:
Regarding a story that appeared in The Post-Star on Dec. 6: "Rep. Gillibrand announces she is pregnant."
First
of all, I must admit that I am a male chauvinist and that there are,
thankfully, differences between men and women. There are many
occupations suitable for women and their physical attributes. Carrying
a weapon while serving in the Armed Forces and firefighting are not
suitable lines of work for women to prove that they are physically
equal to men. How many male police officers feel comfortable with a 100
pound female backup?
And now, I have to add serving in the U.S. House and Senate as an occupation that may not be suitable for women.
Ms. Gillibrand's current pregnancy makes a
strong case for my opinion. Ms. Gillibrand was elected to serve her
constituency, and while she is away from her elected office she cannot
perform those duties. The taxpayers who were duped into voting for her
will have to pay for her medical benefits. Yes, Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer,
Ms. Gillibrand receives excellent health benefits, courtesy of her
constituents. We will be without representation in Congress for a time
leading up to and following the child's birth. There will be times when
she and the new baby will visit doctors. You can add those days to the
total that she will not be serving her constituents.
The current
base salary (2006) for members of the House and Senate is $165,200 per
year. I wonder if Ms. Gillibrand will do the right thing and reimburse
the U.S. Treasury in the amount of $452.60, her daily salary, for each
day that she is unable to perform her elected duties. For some reason,
I doubt it.
RON BLACHUT
Queensbury




